rough
J. tipped me about Marie Kessels’ novel “Ruw” (Rough), which is a novel that seeks to describe, from the inside out, what someone experiences who goes blind later in life. I hadn’t read anything by Marie Kessels, I don’t read much contemporary Dutch literature anyway, so reading it was quite the occasion. Of course I had to scan and OCR the book, because there is no readily accessible version. I read a review in NRC Next, and didn’t like the tone of it, then Carel Peeters’ review in Parool which was better, not like the NRC review. I have my own experiences to go by, a terrible two years that were hard on me, but that had their reward too, and both reviews promised me an even handed approach, an avoidance of easy sentiment. But it wasn’t easy reading. For one thing, I kept being confused about the dating of the novel. There is mention of braille displays and a computer, but aside from that, the protagonist (“I” in this pseudo autobiographical novel) does things the hard way, and teaches herself braille to the exclusion of other modes of access. She foregoes the instruction of an O&M teacher, but chooses to make long walks at night, in order to teach herself the city from an other sensory perspective. Many familiar names and references: John Hull, Saramago’s Blindness. The novel was praised for its painstaking description of the blind experience, at least it was praised for that in the reviews, and the blurb tells me, that this book is an “ode to the anonymous, unassuming blind”. Something is wrong with that, and I kept feeling that wrongness as I read it: on the one hand well researched depictions of the changes someone goes through when she becomes blind. On the other hand, reading it was like reading a science fiction novel: it’s a construction, a reconstruction, a simulacrum of blindness.
There are two schools of blindness philosophy. One, the romantic school, prevalent in the US, maintains that when someone becomes blind, a new person, a blind person needs to be born, the blindness fully acknowledged and part of the persona, before progress can be made. The other school, much practiced in Scandinavian countries and to some extent here, emphasizes adaptive techniques, and sees blindness as a mere attribute whose disadvantages can be overcome by learning proper techniques. In Marie Kessels’ novel, Gemma, the protagonist, the “I” teaches herself to be blind. She does this by adopting the blindness signs: dark glasses, cane, braille. This in itself shows that the book is a fantasy about blindness, despite the obvious research. Both reviews I read praise Kessels for the fact that Gemma’s inner life seems so natural. And so, her “blindness” must be a construction that is true to life. It is as if the entire experience of being black is filtered through “Uncle Tom’s Cabin”. I found some passages incredibly moving, like the descriptions of the long walks through the nocturnal city and some observations are beautifully worded and very subtle and true. I tried so hard to like this novel, but I couldn’t, I guess, because I felt taken advantage of, disparaged as a blind reader. Forced into a mode of experiencing the world that wasn’t mine and never will be mine. Kessels sets herself up to be a “near – native informer” about the inner world of blindness and apparently, to sighted observers, her depiction seems all the more realistic, because it eschews the customary heroism or sentimentality. But the novel doesn’t escape the customary blindness traps. “The blind who never made a fuss”. This is seen as a virtue, because much is made of the stoicism of the main character, Gemma. This in fact recreates the entire “blind personality paradigm” but it does so in a more clever way. I have no doubt that Marie Kessels believes in the veracity of what she has written. It’s only me who sees blindness in that novel as if in a distored mirror. And I don’t like the image, despite the novel’s obvious merits.
solitary
It seems like this is the summer of my winter. A paradox: never did I feel more connected to people, never did I feel more solitary. Perhaps that is, because the next part of this journey can be explained to others less and less. I am enjoying the writing I’m doing for B., the coffee I had with J. today. I even surprised myself by going to E.’s networking thing tomorrow night. Despite the crowds, despite the fact that I feel uncomfortable that way. It may turn out alright. I need to sort out some apartment business this weekend and I’ll have a day together with D., because L.’s away to a rock climbing thing. It feels like a charmed life, and I know it will end being like this, eventually, but not just yet. I could enjoy living like this, but now, to not cling to it, to not hang on to it. To not anticipate the loss. Yes, solitary. It’s lonely out here, but I haven’t yet lost sight of you.
vision
One thing I did to prepare for my quest was to have a means of getting adequate pain medication installed. This would pump the minimum amount of fentanyl directly into my spinal cavity and would keep me virtually pain-free. It seemed I had all my bases covered, as I functioned very well, with the device switched on. Or so I thought. For when I fasted, I got high on the fentanyl. But that was not my objective, and so I dialed down the device to its minimum setting and waited for the pain to come. As the pain rose, my clarity increased until I was on the knife’s edge. Then vision did come, as I sank into a grave of sound and buried myself there. All sound became vision, as I lay listening to dogs barking, the wind in the trees, the rain around me. When it was time to climb down from the mountain, I had to take my time. Four days of pain and fasting had taken its toll, and I had to retreat step by slow step, like learning to walk again. And so I made my way back to the gate, with all vision dissolved. So it stayed, precluding photography, making me silent for a while, visually. Since then, I’ve shot again, after talking about my loss of visual appetite. I concluded -surprised at myself – that it did have to do with the vision quest, with the vision I found there, which was all sound, all movement, all smell, all touch. Now I both care intensely about image making and don’t care at all. I thought about Beethoven’s Grosse Fuge, about how that is music beyond music, sound beyond sound. I’d like to release vision completely, because I never let it go, I practiced it as if I was sighted. I hope I won’t care about what the camera photographs. Freedom! Freedom!
religious
Gelovig Soms
Prijs de dag voor het avond is
voor je gouden verloofde het uitmaakt
voor het donkere deksel het donker maakt
prijs de dag en vertel voor het avond is
hoe het was wat er was dat het goed was
vertel het nog half gelovige oren
prijs de dag prijs de rotzooi
van ronkend blik het lawaai en de schrik
prijs de wind om de lekkende vuilniszak
prijs het licht op de stront de lonk van de lelijke
vrouw en de lik van de hond zonder haar prijs
de lucht van heet asfalt van zweet en patat
prijs een godganselijk godvergeten
goed lullig niet te vervangen leven
voor je leuterend strompelend uitgejoeld afgaat
prijs het
terwijl de lange nacht nadert
de duim nadrukkelijk je strot nadert
Jan G. Elburg
religious sometimes
Praise the day before it’s night
before your golden girlfriend leaves
before the dark lid darkens everything
praise the day and tell before it’s night
what it was like what it was that was good
tell it to still almost faithful ears
praise the day praise the shite
of roaring metal the noise and the fright
praise the wind for the leaking bag of trash
praise the light on shit the ogling of the ugly
woman and the dog’s lick without her price
the smell of hot tarmac of sweat and of fries
praise a godawful ungodly
good cloddish irreplaceable life
before you exit mumbling stumbling bawled out
praise it
while the long night draws near
the thumb approaches your throat without fail
anger
After the first day my scope of activity was reduced to being in my hammock, sleeping, drinking and outside pissing, making water offerings, sitting on a tree stump in the sun, on and off and going back to rest and think. I slept well during the first night, after that, I slept for 20 minutes, then was awake, after a few hours I’d sleep for 20 minutes, woke up, went out to piss, drink, sit on the stump. This gave my thoughts the freedom they so obviously needed. Mother Earth is a stern teacher, not a gentle one. While during the preparation for my quest the predominant emotions were sadness and a deep fear, during the quest it was anger and a neutral, washed out emotion, harsh and bare, that came to the foreground. My chant during the first two days was “I’m just a boy whose intentions are good, please Lord don’t let me be understood.” But on the third day I fell silent. I sat in my circle that I had laid out for myself, with a gate that I could pull shut after me. I just sat there, and felt the hurt and the abuse wash over me, and I had to address all those who I felt abused by. Then, I had to face myself as an abuser, because we are always both. On the fourth night, I invited a good number of people into my death lodge to say goodbye to them, and to speak what had to be spoken. One thing emerged very clearly: my role as a parent, every person, as parent. We were all children, but we are not all parents. It came to me that to be a parent is also to be prepared to die. I also thought that we are two persons: a child and a parent. Sometimes the parent is a minute speck inside of us and we remain children for most of our lives. But to die, you must also dare to be a parent, in whatever sense. I thought of all these things and spoken them. Spoke to D. and L. and said goodbye to them, choking on my love. I needed a lot of time for this: the entire fourth day and fourth night. And then I climbed down from the mountain and went through the gate, from this other reality to the everyday one. The time in the forest is a time of living through life. Re-entering is crossing over into death. The feeling of being welcome, but needing a reason to enter there is predominant. Since then I’ve made regular fasting part of my practice.
sacrifice

It seemed I had to be especially grateful to the trees that carried me, those 4 days and 4 nights. When I arrived at the centre of my spot, I had a hard time finding a place that would catch the sun’s rays, as the edge of the forest was to the north and did not get any sun. I suspected I would be cold there, if I made my sleeping place there and I wanted to find a place in the sun for most of the day. It took me a good part of the day to find a good spot and to find two trees that would carry me and my hammock. I was so relieved and grateful, that I planted my phurba at either tree, to pacify the spirits of the place, and then made a water offering for both trees. This I kept up throughout the days, making sure that I did not drink my first sip of water in the morning before having offered water to the trees. As the wind picked up on the second day, I listened to the trees to my right and I heard them groaning and leaning into each other. I considered how I was directly in the path of these trees: if they fell, they would fall on me and crush me. This I pondered for a day, then I decided to move my hammock and myself out of the way. I spent part of the evening moving my sleeping place, as the wind picked up and roared through the trees. I made offerings to the two trees for a last time, then planted my phurba at the base of the two new trees and made water offerings there. Exhausted, I crawled into my hammock and dozed off, but was awakened by the sound of a tree crashing, at about the place where I had moved my sleeping place from.











2 comments